Exciting stuff, but only 9 states?

Why is that?

      • trashxeos@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Building dual power in the various communities they exist within and firebombing police stations (for legal reasons, the second half of that is a joke)

            • v_pp@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Respectfully… You’re in the CPUSA?? Should they be campaigning for the democrats instead?

              • Makan@lemmygrad.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                We don’t campaign for Democrats and we do run our own candidates and have won seats several times.

                But tbh, we may at times go door-knocking for them at the local level, depending on the district.

                So there’s that.

                I just feel that, with PSL funding, which is likely more steep than what we have, they could do a “blitz” throughout the country on the local level elections and affect local policy, thus getting more cred and goodwill among the proletariat. A big push in that direction would do wonders. It would show that MLs mean business.

                That’s my personal feeling on this.

                I think Presidential elections are useless.

                (Respectfully, I’m not attacking PSL at all.)

                • v_pp@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  So you door knock for them, and leadership always endorses them. But you don’t campaign for them. Got it.

    • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      National elections are the best way to raise your profile, and they show you have national ambitions. Doing those and nothing else would be a problem, but it makes sense to have national candidates as part of a movement-building strategy.

      • I feel like that strategy holds up more in a proportional or parliamentary system, then in a majoritarian, presidential system, like what the US has.

        The bar to enter a presidential race is so high, and requires so much effort, with so little return on investment, that it feels like a waste to me.

        • v_pp@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They are running a propaganda campaign more than a presidential campaign. Every campaign volunteer is someone who may join the party, and every signature is an opportunity to talk to strangers about socialism and the failure of bourgeois democracy. And from that perspective, it seems like it’s been fairly successful.