cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15985920

With the UAP disclosures came this, a breakdown of the most likely origins of UAPs

it’s from a video with the Colonel Nell that was in the discussion of the SOL foundation video with the same man

  • Aolley@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    This would be a direct link to the photo: https://i.imgur.com/NMNDl6b.png that I think it pretty interesting but that video shows a controlled disclosure timeline slide that is very interesting because the 2026 target of getting the fact accepted by some is potentially off track and it’s from there that the academic study and eventual (timed currently 2030 {accd that slide}) total public disclosure are based on that milestone

    • HM05@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Since the Schumer amendment didn’t pass in full, there could be some deviation to the timeline. However, some essential elements of the amendment will get the ball rolling.

      By October of this year, all UAP related government documents should be provided to the National Archives. That means we should be seeing non-classified documents and redacted classified documents being made public this year. Though, one of the items stripped from the amendment was the committee needed to review the classified documents and ensure all documents are provided to the archives. However, there is potential for that to be added in any of the upcoming National Defense Authorization Acts.

  • HM05@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is a great breakdown of potential origins. It’s important to note that the phenomenon is broad and will encompasses multiple origins on this chart.

    For anyone that wants more info on Colonel Karl Nell’s statements, there is the SOL foundation presentation this slide came from and Nell’s discussion at SALT where he stated “There’s zero doubt” that non-human intelligence has been interacting with humanity.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s zero doubt” that non-human intelligence has been interacting with humanity.

      This is just so preposterous.

      An entitity so advanced it could reach us from another planet, and yet it occasionally fails to conceal itself from us?

      We’re talking multiple orders of magnitude more advanced…as far as we currently understand, FTL is impossible (the energies required for space-folding concepts are beyond realistic).

      This is more misdirection by gov/military/intelligence agencies.

      • HM05@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        To start, the post is about a large range of proposed origin of UAP. Why did you latch onto extraterrestrial when it encompasses a small fraction of suggestions of what non-human intelligence could be?

        You then make the assumption that they are from another planet that would require FTL travel and that they are concerned about being seen.

        Did you look at this post and have you listened to Karl Nell’s discussions? It seems that you came in here to make an argument without understanding what you were arguing against.

        I’m not stating that Nell is right in his claims, but please at least address the claims he’s made.