• gaymersriseup666@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is conflicting for me because on the one hand, this is objectively offside even if it’s by millimeters, and I like this technology for eliminating the human error element.

    On the other, the offside rule itself is a bit insane to me these days with VAR—I feel like the spirit of the rule has been lost—this is not giving the attacking player a clear advantage. Yes it’s offside by the law—but for what?

  • Rude-Strength-2957@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    argh i know that its right, like its good that its objective, but it does sortve rub me the wrong way be because the attacking player gained no advantage from being such a small margin offside

  • badassery11@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are we sure the system is this accurate? I don’t know how it could be without, like, 970 cameras.

    • Chrissy_____@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t, but scientists who made it and high school students interested in the technology are able to easily comprehend it

  • zulu9812@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The body part that’s offside can’t even legally play the ball. It’s ridiculous. They should just go back to feet placement.

  • Glass-Star6635@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Genuinely don’t think this is how the rule was intended to be interpreted. Should really just use feet because this looks like a perfectly timed run to me.

  • akselmonrose@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair. With modern AI. We could completely eliminate referees between completely in a few years. Just need enough camera angles with high fps. Would fans go for that I wonder?

  • HarbyFullyLoaded_12@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s harsh but I will never argue against the semi automated offsides. They’re always right. It’s not a bunch of useless cunts drawing lines.

    • vintage-buttplugs@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Instances like this isn’t why the offside rule was introduced though. It’s morally wrong for this to be called offside

        • vintage-buttplugs@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Na, not having it. You can’t honestly think looking at that image this is deserving of an offside decision. This sport is fast becoming a referee-centric enterprise and it’s sad to see fuck all pushback from fans. In fact, people actually defend shit like this

          • Nilbogoblins@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It does beg the question what do we want from our football. I like how it’s objective but I would rather a ref got it wrong and let the flow of the game continue frankly.

            No one would have argued over a call as tight as this this before VAR right or wrong.

      • tiezalbo@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The line has to be drawn somewhere though and regardless of where that is, you will always have these calls 1mm over the line